56 replies to this topic

[Max Power]

That wasn't a grammar problem.

[Hutch]

Max Power, on 14 March 2010 - 08:46 AM, said:

That wasn't a grammar problem.

I agree. But it is the same type of personality that takes issue with grammar, punctuation (etc.) errors on a forum like this. Not sure whether it's anal rententive or anal fixation...either way makes them an asshole

[Pete]

Hutch, on 14 March 2010 - 02:08 PM, said:

I agree. But it is the same type of personality that takes issue with grammar, punctuation (etc.) errors on a forum like this. Not sure whether it's anal rententive or anal fixation...either way makes them an asshole

Just because you have a limited grasp of comprehension it makes someone else an asshole for pointing it out? If you're going to fire shots maybe you should, at the very least, pick up a thesaurus.

[Prizetek]

Pete, on 14 March 2010 - 03:38 PM, said:

Just because you have a limited grasp of comprehension it makes someone else an asshole for pointing it out? If you're going to fire shots maybe you should, at the very least, pick up a thesaurus.

Yeah, well, he's dating a chick 25 years younger than him and you're not.

So there - he wins!

[Hutch]

Pete, on 14 March 2010 - 03:38 PM, said:

Just because you have a limited grasp of comprehension it makes someone else an asshole for pointing it out?

Pretty much. Not so much as a matter of my comprehension, but as a meaningless attempt at a demonstation of how smart they are. Most folks just read right past the error, understanding what was meant. The anal retentive assholes seem to have a compulsive need to needlessly correct others. I'm fairly certain that it's an effort to compensate for a "shortcoming"

Pete, on 14 March 2010 - 03:38 PM, said:

If you're going to fire shots maybe you should, at the very least, pick up a thesaurus.

Thanks for clearing things up. As stated above, I gave you the benefit of the doubt, thinking you might actually be asking a question. Now I see that it was just your oh-so-cute way of being an asshole. I've been searching my obviously inadaquate vocabulary for the most definitive, yet politically correct, way to express my feelings. The best that I can come up with is:

FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE !

[Edman]

Prizetek, on 15 March 2010 - 09:05 AM, said:

Yeah, well, he's dating a chick 25 years younger than him and you're not.

So there - he wins!

I thought the one who dies with the most toys wins.

[Pete]

Hutch, on 15 March 2010 - 03:41 PM, said:

Pretty much. Not so much as a matter of my comprehension, but as a meaningless attempt at a demonstation of how smart they are. Most folks just read right past the error, understanding what was meant. The anal retentive assholes seem to have a compulsive need to needlessly correct others. I'm fairly certain that it's an effort to compensate for a "shortcoming"



Thanks for clearing things up. As stated above, I gave you the benefit of the doubt, thinking you might actually be asking a question. Now I see that it was just your oh-so-cute way of being an asshole. I've been searching my obviously inadaquate vocabulary for the most definitive, yet politically correct, way to express my feelings. The best that I can come up with is:

FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE !

Very eloquent. Gosh.....how does one generate a comeback for something like that? Ok now I feel bad. Of course I knew what you meant when you used 'insure'. Heck even I was surprised when jumped right into using terms like anal retentive, asshole and faggot so early into our exchange. As for my part in all this I apologize for mentioning it.

[Hutch]

Pete, on 15 March 2010 - 06:44 PM, said:

Very eloquent. Gosh.....how does one generate a comeback for something like that? Ok now I feel bad. Of course I knew what you meant when you used 'insure'. Heck even I was surprised when jumped right into using terms like anal retentive, asshole and faggot so early into our exchange. As for my part in all this I apologize for mentioning it.

Accepted. I apologize for the name calling.

[Prizetek]

Pete, on 15 March 2010 - 06:44 PM, said:

Very eloquent. Gosh.....how does one generate a comeback for something like that? Ok now I feel bad. Of course I knew what you meant when you used 'insure'. Heck even I was surprised when jumped right into using terms like anal retentive, asshole and faggot so early into our exchange. As for my part in all this I apologize for mentioning it.

I dew knot mean too bee to complementary hear, but eye think it was big of ewe two overlook the fowl things he rote hear about ewe just four pointing out that he did not use the write word.

[Pete]

Prizetek, on 16 March 2010 - 01:22 PM, said:

I dew knot mean too bee to complementary hear, but eye think it was big of ewe two overlook the fowl things he rote hear about ewe just four pointing out that he did not use the write word.

Oh come on now don't be condescending. To point that out would make you an asshole. I have seen the error of my ways and, consequently, began my participation in the dumbing down of America. You should now expect a terse response that includes name calling and references to your sexual preference as well as anatomy. Anything less wouldn't be fare. Er....fair.....Heh heh heh.....

[Hutch]

Ahhhhh. Ya got me. I'd thought that your apology was sincere. Silly, uneducated me...fooled by smart ol' you. I didn't think of you as one of Piggy's minions. Noted.

[Prizetek]

Hutch, on 17 March 2010 - 07:34 AM, said:

Ahhhhh. Ya got me. I'd thought that your apology was sincere. Silly, uneducated me...fooled by smart ol' you. I didn't think of you as one of Piggy's minions. Noted.

Actually, how do you know that I am not one of HIS minions?

Pete and I in cahoots . . .

[Pete]

Prizetek, on 17 March 2010 - 09:20 AM, said:

Actually, how do you know that I am not one of HIS minions?

Pete and I in cahoots . . .

Now THAT'S funny!

[Hutch]

Prizetek, on 17 March 2010 - 09:20 AM, said:

Actually, how do you know that I am not one of HIS minions?

Pete and I in cahoots . . .

You're correct. I really don't know. In fact, as uneducated as I am, it's a wonder that I have the nerve to post at all. I look forward to future opportunities to learn from you...in person would be especially wonderful

[Pete]

Hutch, on 17 March 2010 - 10:38 AM, said:

You're correct. I really don't know. In fact, as uneducated as I am, it's a wonder that I have the nerve to post at all. I look forward to future opportunities to learn from you...in person would be especially wonderful

Sounds good. If you make it up to Minnesota let me know. I'll even provide the cigars.

[Max Power]

Hutch, on 17 March 2010 - 07:34 AM, said:

Ahhhhh. Ya got me. I'd thought that your apology was sincere. Silly, uneducated me...fooled by smart ol' you. I didn't think of you as one of Piggy's minions. Noted.

I think you have been hanging out with cheerleaders too long.

[Hutch]

Max Power, on 18 March 2010 - 06:25 AM, said:

I think you have been hanging out with cheerleaders too long.

Don't know any cheerleaders...haven't in probably 35 years. Not sure why you make things up, but have at it if it makes you think you appear witty.

Pete, on 17 March 2010 - 08:09 PM, said:

Sounds good. If you make it up to Minnesota let me know. I'll even provide the cigars.

That was actually meant for Piggy. But y'all have so many excellent fishing lakes that I will undoubtedly get up that way eventually. I'll holler when the boat's hooked up